 Relationships |
|
| Anonymous | Login | 2024-04-19 13:10 CEST |
| Main | My View | View Issues |
| Viewing Issue Simple Details [ Jump to Notes ] | [ View Advanced ] [ Issue History ] [ Print ] | ||||||
| ID | Category | Severity | Reproducibility | Date Submitted | Last Update | ||
| 0004691 | [pixman] packaging | major | always | 2011-02-17 01:55 | 2011-04-20 14:45 | ||
| Reporter | flod | View Status | public | ||||
| Assigned To | dam | ||||||
| Priority | normal | Resolution | fixed | ||||
| Status | closed | ||||||
| Summary | 0004691: package repositories provide versions inconsistently over the mirrors | ||||||
| Description |
There are at least three different versions that are mentioned as the latest on the various mirrors/websites. Website: http://www.opencsw.org/packages/CSWpixman/ [^] : 0.21.4,REV=2011.02.02 ibiblio: http://mirrors.ibiblio.org/pub/mirrors/opencsw/current/i386/5.10/ [^] -> http://mirrors.ibiblio.org/pub/mirrors/opencsw/current/i386/5.10/pixman-0.17.10%2cREV%3d2010.03.06-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz [^] usc.edu: http://mirrors.usc.edu/pub/csw/current/i386/5.10/pixman-0.17.8,REV=2010.02.25-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz [^] ftp.uni-erlangen.de http://ftp.uni-erlangen.de/pub/mirrors/csw/current/i386/5.10/pixman-0.17.8,REV=2010.02.25-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz [^] |
||||||
| Additional Information | |||||||
| Tags | No tags attached. | ||||||
| Attached Files | |||||||
|
|
|||||||
|
Relationships |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
(0008802) dam (administrator) 2011-02-17 09:29 |
Hi, there has been a glitch in package release: http://lists.opencsw.org/pipermail/pkgsubmissions/2011-February/002316.html [^] Hopefully the issue is fixed now. The updated version will be released when it is decided whether development packages will keep the existing -devel or move to -dev. Unfortunately there has been a misunderstanding when I thought this had been settled. Thanks for the report! -- Dago |
|
(0008803) flod (reporter) 2011-02-17 15:36 |
I checked the list before submitting my report. So I was aware of the issue. As I am a big fan of naming schemes, I find it perfectly reasonable. As disucussed there, submission and rollback should be always en bloc. It is totally okay, that there are rollbacks. But I consider it a bug in the rollback process that some mirrors do/did not show the latest version before the wrongly released packages. They showed another older version before that. When rolling back this should not happen. |
|
(0008980) dam (administrator) 2011-04-20 14:45 |
A new version of pixman 0.21.4,REV=2011.02.02 has been released to current/ and pushed to all mirrors. |
| Copyright © 2000 - 2008 Mantis Group |  |
