Mantis - pixman
Viewing Issue Advanced Details
ID: Category: Severity: Reproducibility: Date Submitted: Last Update:
4691 packaging major always 2011-02-17 01:55 2011-04-20 14:45
Reporter: flod Platform:  
Assigned To: dam OS:  
Priority: normal OS Version:  
Status: closed Product Version:  
Product Build: Resolution: fixed  
Projection: none      
ETA: none Fixed in Version:  
Summary: 0004691: package repositories provide versions inconsistently over the mirrors
Description: There are at least three different versions that are mentioned as the latest on the various mirrors/websites.

Website:
http://www.opencsw.org/packages/CSWpixman/ [^] : 0.21.4,REV=2011.02.02

ibiblio:
http://mirrors.ibiblio.org/pub/mirrors/opencsw/current/i386/5.10/ [^] ->
http://mirrors.ibiblio.org/pub/mirrors/opencsw/current/i386/5.10/pixman-0.17.10%2cREV%3d2010.03.06-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz [^]

usc.edu:
http://mirrors.usc.edu/pub/csw/current/i386/5.10/pixman-0.17.8,REV=2010.02.25-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz [^]

ftp.uni-erlangen.de
http://ftp.uni-erlangen.de/pub/mirrors/csw/current/i386/5.10/pixman-0.17.8,REV=2010.02.25-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz [^]
Steps To Reproduce:
Additional Information:
Relationships
Attached Files:
Issue History
Date Modified Username Field Change
2011-02-17 01:55 flod New Issue
2011-02-17 09:27 dam Status new => assigned
2011-02-17 09:27 dam Assigned To => dam
2011-02-17 09:29 dam Note Added: 0008802
2011-02-17 15:36 flod Note Added: 0008803
2011-04-20 14:45 dam Note Added: 0008980
2011-04-20 14:45 dam Status assigned => closed
2011-04-20 14:45 dam Resolution open => fixed

Notes
(0008802)
dam   
2011-02-17 09:29   
Hi,

there has been a glitch in package release:
 http://lists.opencsw.org/pipermail/pkgsubmissions/2011-February/002316.html [^]
Hopefully the issue is fixed now. The updated version will be released when it is decided whether development packages will keep the existing -devel or move to -dev. Unfortunately there has been a misunderstanding when I thought this had been settled.

Thanks for the report!

  -- Dago
(0008803)
flod   
2011-02-17 15:36   
I checked the list before submitting my report.
So I was aware of the issue.

As I am a big fan of naming schemes, I find it perfectly reasonable.
As disucussed there, submission and rollback should be always en bloc.

It is totally okay, that there are rollbacks. But I consider it a bug in the rollback process that some mirrors do/did not show the latest version before the wrongly released packages. They showed another older version before that.
When rolling back this should not happen.
(0008980)
dam   
2011-04-20 14:45   
A new version of pixman 0.21.4,REV=2011.02.02 has been released to current/ and pushed to all mirrors.