 Relationships |
|
| Anonymous | Login | 2024-04-16 13:44 CEST |
| Main | My View | View Issues |
| Viewing Issue Simple Details [ Jump to Notes ] | [ View Advanced ] [ Issue History ] [ Print ] | ||||||
| ID | Category | Severity | Reproducibility | Date Submitted | Last Update | ||
| 0003666 | [gdk_pixbuf] packaging | minor | always | 2009-05-12 15:32 | 2013-10-27 08:59 | ||
| Reporter | user2188 | View Status | public | ||||
| Assigned To | |||||||
| Priority | normal | Resolution | fixed | ||||
| Status | closed | ||||||
| Summary | 0003666: libgdk_pixbuf.la references non-existent .la files, breaks graphviz builds | ||||||
| Description |
Building graphviz fails with: /bin/bash ../../libtool --tag=CC --mode=link cc -g -version-info 6:0:0 -L/opt/csw/lib -o libgvplugin_gdk_pixbuf.la -rpath /opt/csw/lib/graphviz gvplugin_gdk_pixbuf.lo gvdevice_gdk_pixbuf.lo ../../lib/gvc/libgvc.la -L/opt/csw/lib -lgdk_pixbuf-2.0 -lgobject-2.0 -lgmodule-2.0 -lglib-2.0 -lintl grep: /opt/csw/lib/libgmodule-2.0.la: No such file or directory I believe this error is originating from: /opt/csw/lib/libgmodule-2.0.la which contains a reference to this non-existent file. (Also to ls: /opt/csw/lib/libgobject-2.0.la and /opt/csw/lib/libglib-2.0.la) A more general question is: why are .la files being installed at all by opencsw? I don't understand all the rationale, but I note that Fedora does not install any .la files. |
||||||
| Additional Information | |||||||
| Tags | No tags attached. | ||||||
| Attached Files | |||||||
|
|
|||||||
|
Relationships |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
(0006105) user2188 2009-05-12 16:13 |
Correction: I believe the problem originates in the installed: /opt/csw/lib/libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.la which references the non-existent files. |
|
(0006106) dam (administrator) 2009-05-12 16:34 |
.la files were included in the past, but the current policy is to exclude them: <http://www.opencsw.org/standards/build> [^] New packages should take care to EXCLUDE libtool .la files. They are not helpful, and often create more problems than they solve. Unfortunately, existing packages may need to preserve them, until all dependant packages have their own configs adjusted to not use .la files. There is also a script which fixes Makefile to use linker directives instead of .la files. The usage in GAR is documented at <http://apps.sourceforge.net/trac/gar/wiki/LibTool> [^] Please ask on maintainers@ for further advice if needed. |
|
(0006107) phil (reporter) 2009-05-12 18:58 |
this is actually a bug in gmodule. Please file a bug with THAT package, to repackage without .la files. |
|
(0006108) user2188 2009-05-12 19:21 |
This may *also* be a bug with gmodule, but *this* package is installing /opt/csw/lib/libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.la with broken references, so minimally it needs to be repackaged without it. I'll file a bug against glib for /opt/csw/lib/libgmodule.la (I'm finding the .la files on the build8s host) |
|
(0006109) phil (reporter) 2009-05-12 19:41 |
since the offending package is mine, please feel free to repackage and take over glib. |
|
(0010607) raos (manager) 2013-10-27 08:59 |
Closing old bug. |
| Copyright © 2000 - 2008 Mantis Group |  |
