| Anonymous | Login | 2026-03-20 15:34 CET |
| Main | My View | View Issues |
| Viewing Issue Simple Details [ Jump to Notes ] | [ View Advanced ] [ Issue History ] [ Print ] | ||||||
| ID | Category | Severity | Reproducibility | Date Submitted | Last Update | ||
| 0003719 | [links] upgrade | feature | N/A | 2009-06-21 21:33 | 2009-06-24 23:19 | ||
| Reporter | trygvis | View Status | public | ||||
| Assigned To | |||||||
| Priority | normal | Resolution | not fixable | ||||
| Status | closed | ||||||
| Summary | 0003719: Upgrade to 2.2 (from 1.0) | ||||||
| Description | Summary say it all. | ||||||
| Additional Information | |||||||
| Tags | No tags attached. | ||||||
| Attached Files | |||||||
|
|
|||||||
Notes |
|
|
(0006337) philadmin (viewer) 2009-06-24 20:16 |
Err.. no the subject doesnt say it all. it doenst say where to get this alleged version 2.2 links.sourceforge.net, only seems to have the old 0.99 version |
|
(0006338) trygvis (reporter) 2009-06-24 22:45 |
Err, a basic search give you: http://links.twibright.com/download.php. [^] It is also linked to from links.sourceforge.net |
|
(0006339) philadmin (viewer) 2009-06-24 23:18 |
that is not "links.sourceforge.net". it is a fork. This "bug report", then, does not belong in the category of "upgrade". It becomes more of a feature request or something, along the lines of, "links, the original, is obsolete. Please replace with the fork found at xxx.yyy...zzz". Except that there are multiple. and as a side note, we already have a package for one of the forks: elinks. Hmph. they really should have renamed the one you are referencing. Or taken over the sourceforge area. I'm not sure how best to deal with the transition/rename/whatever. Please start a discussion on the maintainers list, if you're really like to see the twibright version packaged. Closing this "update" bug. |
| Copyright © 2000 - 2008 Mantis Group |