 Relationships |
|
| Anonymous | Login | 2024-04-20 14:12 CEST |
| Main | My View | View Issues |
| Viewing Issue Advanced Details [ Jump to Notes ] | [ View Simple ] [ Issue History ] [ Print ] | ||||||
| ID | Category | Severity | Reproducibility | Date Submitted | Last Update | ||
| 0004054 | [pkg_get] regular use | major | always | 2009-11-23 13:17 | 2009-11-23 14:10 | ||
| Reporter | skayser | View Status | public | ||||
| Assigned To | bonivart | ||||||
| Priority | normal | Resolution | fixed | Platform | |||
| Status | closed | OS | |||||
| Projection | none | OS Version | |||||
| ETA | none | Product Build | |||||
| Summary | 0004054: Could cswclassutils always be upgraded/installed first? | ||||||
| Description |
I have just upgraded axel from testing and a cswclassutils upgrade came along at the same time. As axel depends on cswclassutils I would have expected that cswclassutils would be upgraded first, but axel was upgraded first. Is there a reasoning to NOT upgrade depends first? Could pkgutil either upgrade/install depends first (general case) or at least upgrade/install cswclassutils first? There might be CAS contained in an updated cswclassutils on which an updated package relies on. # pkgutil -t http://mirror.opencsw.org/opencsw/testing [^] -u axel Fetching new catalog and descriptions (http://mirror.opencsw.org/opencsw/testing/i386/5.10) [^] if available... Fetching new catalog and descriptions (ftp://ftpint.consol.de/pub/comp/os/solaris/opencsw//current/i386/5.10) [^] if available... Fetching new catalog and descriptions (file:///install/pkgs/consol/i386/5.10) [^] if available... Parsing catalog, may take a while... Install UPDATED packages: CSWaxel-2.4,REV=2009.11.23 CSWcswclassutils-1.30,REV=2009.11.21 CURRENT packages: CSWcommon-1.4.7,REV=2009.09.20 Total size: 46.5 KB 2 packages to fetch. Do you want to continue? [Y,n] Fetching CSWcswclassutils-1.30,REV=2009.11.21 (1/2)... Fetching CSWaxel-2.4,REV=2009.11.23 (2/2)... => Removing old version of CSWaxel The following package is currently installed: CSWaxel axel - Lightweight command-line download accelerator (i386) 2.3,REV=2009.03.31 Do you want to remove this package? [y,n,?,q] ... |
||||||
| Steps To Reproduce | |||||||
| Additional Information |
# pkgutil -v 1.9b2 |
||||||
| Tags | No tags attached. | ||||||
| Attached Files | |||||||
|
|
|||||||
|
Relationships |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
(0007024) bonivart (developer) 2009-11-23 13:46 |
Did you go through with the install or did you abort? In your posted output I can't see that. A new feature in 1.9 is to remove all updates before installing all packages to better handle package splits that cause file collisions. Maybe you interpreted that the removal of axel meant it would also be installed (before cswclassutils) like it would in previous releases. Look at my test run below. I installed axel from current first without updating cswclassutil (-iN axel) so I should have the same state as in your example when doing the update, the list of packages is the same. # pkgutil -t http://mirror.opencsw.org/opencsw/testing [^] -u axel Install UPDATED packages: CSWaxel-2.4,REV=2009.11.23 CSWcswclassutils-1.30,REV=2009.11.21 CURRENT packages: CSWcommon-1.4.7,REV=2009.09.20 Total size: 46.5 KB 2 packages to fetch. Do you want to continue? [Y,n] Fetching CSWcswclassutils-1.30,REV=2009.11.21 (1/2)... Fetching CSWaxel-2.4,REV=2009.11.23 (2/2)... => Removing old version of CSWaxel Removal of <CSWaxel> was successful. => Removing old version of CSWcswclassutils Removal of <CSWcswclassutils> was successful. => Installing CSWcswclassutils-1.30,REV=2009.11.21 Installation of <CSWcswclassutils> was successful. => Installing CSWaxel-2.4,REV=2009.11.23 Installation of <CSWaxel> was successful. As you can see it removes both axel and cswclassutils before installing the new versions with cswclassutils before axel. |
|
(0007027) skayser (administrator) 2009-11-23 14:01 |
You are right, going through with the update i can see exactly the same as in your example output. Thanks for the clarification, didn't know about the changed behavior in 1.9 (should have read the readme). |
| Copyright © 2000 - 2008 Mantis Group |  |
