Anonymous | Login | 2024-04-19 01:01 CEST |
Main | My View | View Issues |
Viewing Issue Simple Details [ Jump to Notes ] | [ View Advanced ] [ Issue History ] [ Print ] | |||||||||||
ID | Category | Severity | Reproducibility | Date Submitted | Last Update | |||||||
0002745 | [ucarp] packaging | text | always | 2008-01-18 15:07 | 2008-01-18 18:46 | |||||||
Reporter | dam | View Status | public | |||||||||
Assigned To | calessio | |||||||||||
Priority | normal | Resolution | open | |||||||||
Status | assigned | |||||||||||
Summary | 0002745: The package should document the applied patches | |||||||||||
Description | The applied patches and the usage should be documented inside the files in the package. | |||||||||||
Additional Information |
From csw-users mailing list: I\'ll refer to: http://lists.blastwave.org/pipermail/users/2006-June/001543.html [^] , which lists a number of Solaris specific patches for ucarp. Of particular interest would be \'patch 003-ucarp-solaris-if.diff\', as I appear to have a problem with timing between master and backup. (The new master detects backup as active on the virtual IP and decides to disable the virtual IP.) Are these patches present in the version of ucarp currently on blastwave? It sure doesn\'t look like it, but I could be mistaken. If the patches really are present, are there any undocumented switches I could use? In short, how do I go about not using the up/down scripts? Regards, Dag B. |
|||||||||||
Tags | No tags attached. | |||||||||||
Attached Files | ||||||||||||
|
There are no notes attached to this issue. |
Copyright © 2000 - 2008 Mantis Group |