<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>OpenCSW Solaris packages</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.opencsw.org/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.opencsw.org</link>
	<description>Community SoftWare for Solaris</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 20:38:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Which catalog should I use?</title>
		<link>http://www.opencsw.org/2012/01/which-catalog-should-i-use/</link>
		<comments>http://www.opencsw.org/2012/01/which-catalog-should-i-use/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jan 2012 11:36:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Maciej Bliziński</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.opencsw.org/?p=1198</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[“Should I use the testing, or the unstable catalog?” The short answer is: you need to use both.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In November 2011, we&#8217;ve announced a <a href="http://www.opencsw.org/2011/11/release-branches-adjusted/">new catalog layout</a>. For some users, the choice of the catalog might be unclear; “should I use the testing, or the unstable catalog?” (The stable catalog is dead.)</p>
<p>The short answer is: it&#8217;s best if you use both testing and unstable.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s consider the alternative: using only one catalog on all machines. If you use unstable (also in production), you&#8217;ll keep getting a lot of updates, and chances are that some of them will be broken. On the other hand, if you use only the testing catalog, there will be less churn, but you won&#8217;t spot problems in packages while they&#8217;re in unstable and you will increase chances of a bad package push to testing.</p>
<p>If you run a site where you have production and development / testing machines, you can use the unstable catalog for the ones that have higher instability tolerance. If anything breaks in unstable, you&#8217;ll notice the problem but it won&#8217;t be an operational issue for you. If you get back to us with a report, we&#8217;ll fix the it, and the bug won&#8217;t make it into the testing catalog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.opencsw.org/2012/01/which-catalog-should-i-use/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The pkg-get Tool is deprecated</title>
		<link>http://www.opencsw.org/2011/12/the-pkg-get-tool-is-being-deprecated/</link>
		<comments>http://www.opencsw.org/2011/12/the-pkg-get-tool-is-being-deprecated/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2011 19:31:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>bwalton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Announcements]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.opencsw.org/?p=1191</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We just released an updated version of CSWpkgget that deprecates the pkg-get tool and pulls in pkgutil.  As many sites will have automation built around pkg-get, it is still possible to use the tool but steps will be required to do so.  Going forward, pkgutil is the supported OpenCSW package management tool.  All automation should [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We just released an updated version of CSWpkgget that deprecates the pkg-get tool and pulls in pkgutil.  As many sites will have automation built around pkg-get, it is still possible to use the tool but steps will be required to do so.  Going forward, pkgutil is the supported OpenCSW package management tool.  All automation should be converted to use pkgutil.</p>
<p>The full announcement is in the <a title="pkg-get deprecation notice" href="http://lists.opencsw.org/pipermail/users/2011-December/009117.html" target="_blank">CSW Users list archive</a>.  The announcement includes details on how to continue using pkg-get if required.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.opencsw.org/2011/12/the-pkg-get-tool-is-being-deprecated/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GCC-4.6.2 is available from unstable</title>
		<link>http://www.opencsw.org/2011/11/gcc-4-6-2-is-available-from-unstable/</link>
		<comments>http://www.opencsw.org/2011/11/gcc-4-6-2-is-available-from-unstable/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2011 11:51:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Maciej Bliziński</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Recent updates]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.opencsw.org/?p=1148</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We&#8217;ve pushed GCC&#8211;4.6.2 into unstable.  Before we promote it to dublin (see the release branches for information what that means), we need to add the Ada compiler, which still requires more work.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We&#8217;ve pushed GCC&#8211;4.6.2 into <a href="http://mirror.opencsw.org/opencsw/">unstable</a>.  Before we promote it to dublin (see the <a href="http://www.opencsw.org/2011/11/release-branches-adjusted/">release branches</a> for information what that means), we need to add the Ada compiler, which still requires more work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.opencsw.org/2011/11/gcc-4-6-2-is-available-from-unstable/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The R Project is available</title>
		<link>http://www.opencsw.org/2011/11/the-r-project-is-available/</link>
		<comments>http://www.opencsw.org/2011/11/the-r-project-is-available/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2011 11:48:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Maciej Bliziński</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Recent updates]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.opencsw.org/?p=1146</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We&#8217;ve released the R Project into the unstable catalog.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We&#8217;ve released the <a href="http://www.r-project.org/">R Project</a> into the <a href="http://mirror.opencsw.org/opencsw/">unstable catalog</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.opencsw.org/2011/11/the-r-project-is-available/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Solaris 9 is now best effort</title>
		<link>http://www.opencsw.org/2011/11/solaris-9-is-now-best-effort/</link>
		<comments>http://www.opencsw.org/2011/11/solaris-9-is-now-best-effort/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2011 11:44:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Maciej Bliziński</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Announcements]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.opencsw.org/?p=1144</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As Solaris 9 has now entered the Vintage/Extended support phase, future package updates and new packages will be done on a best effort basis. Each maintainer will be able to decide whether supporting Solaris 9 is something they are willing or able to do. We apologize if this causes you any inconvenience. (the original announcement [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As Solaris 9 has now <a href="http://blogs.oracle.com/patch/entry/solaris_9_transitioning_to_extended">entered the Vintage/Extended support phase</a>, future package updates and new packages will be done on a best effort basis.  Each maintainer will be able to decide whether supporting Solaris 9 is something they are willing or able to do.</p>
<p>We apologize if this causes you any inconvenience.</p>
<p><em>(the <a href="http://lists.opencsw.org/pipermail/users/2011-November/009093.html">original announcement</a> is on the users mailing list)</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.opencsw.org/2011/11/solaris-9-is-now-best-effort/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Release Branches Adjusted</title>
		<link>http://www.opencsw.org/2011/11/release-branches-adjusted/</link>
		<comments>http://www.opencsw.org/2011/11/release-branches-adjusted/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2011 23:40:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sebastian Kayser</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Announcements]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.opencsw.org/?p=1057</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We&#8217;ve added a good amount of automation to the package release workflow over the last few months. Along with this, the release branches that you might know from previous years (&#8220;stable&#8221;, &#8220;current&#8221;, and &#8220;unstable&#8221;) have been slightly adjusted. Time for everyone not yet familiar with the changes to catch up. &#8220;unstable&#8221; is still the place [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We&#8217;ve added a good amount of automation to the package release workflow over the last few months. Along with this, the release branches that you might know from previous years (&#8220;stable&#8221;, &#8220;current&#8221;, and &#8220;unstable&#8221;) have been slightly adjusted. Time for everyone not yet familiar with the changes to catch up.</p>
<p>&#8220;<strong>unstable</strong>&#8221; is still the place for the most recent packages, that&#8217;s where we intially upload packages. &#8220;<strong>current</strong>&#8221; on the other hand now offers a middle ground. It points to &#8220;<strong>testing</strong>&#8220;, a branch which receives staggered package updates from &#8220;unstable&#8221;. Finally, &#8220;<strong>stable</strong>&#8221; is officially deprecated &#8211; which it de-facto was for quite some time now. You can still use it, but it is very old and won&#8217;t see updates. As a replacement for &#8220;stable&#8221; we&#8217;ve started to work on something called named releases. More on that in due time.</p>
<h3>To sum it up in a picture</h3>
<p><a href="http://www.opencsw.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/opencsw-release-branches-2011-10.png" target="_blank"><img src="http://www.opencsw.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/opencsw-release-branches-2011-10-300x216.png" alt="" title="OpenCSW Release Branches 2011-10" width="300" height="216" class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-1110" /></a></p>
<h3>What&#8217;s next?</h3>
<p>There&#8217;s still a bunch to do. Automating the &#8220;unstable&#8221; -&gt; &#8220;testing&#8221; workflow, propagating the substantial backlog of updates from &#8220;unstable&#8221;, and getting a named release out of the door are among the main ones. In the meantime, the &#8220;<a href="/get-it/releases/">Release Branches</a>&#8221; page has been updated and the branches &#8220;unstable&#8221; and &#8220;testing&#8221; are your friends. Any questions? <a href="/support/">Let us know</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.opencsw.org/2011/11/release-branches-adjusted/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New signing key</title>
		<link>http://www.opencsw.org/2011/09/new-signing-key/</link>
		<comments>http://www.opencsw.org/2011/09/new-signing-key/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Sep 2011 11:44:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Maciej Bliziński</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Announcements]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.opencsw.org/?p=1015</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After the change of the way packages get published, we&#8217;re announcing a new signing key. They key ID is 9306CC77, and it is available from our mirrors page and pgp.mit.edu.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After the change of the way packages get published, we&#8217;re announcing a new signing key.  They key ID is 9306CC77, and it is available from <a href="http://www.opencsw.org/get-it/mirrors/">our mirrors page</a> and <a href="http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&#038;search=0x05F42D669306CC77">pgp.mit.edu</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.opencsw.org/2011/09/new-signing-key/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>WeSunSolve.net: A Useful Solaris Community Resource</title>
		<link>http://www.opencsw.org/2011/08/wesunsolve-net-a-useful-solaris-community-resource/</link>
		<comments>http://www.opencsw.org/2011/08/wesunsolve-net-a-useful-solaris-community-resource/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Aug 2011 00:07:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>bwalton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.opencsw.org/?p=1005</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was recently alerted to a useful resource for the Solaris Community that is worth sharing.  The wesunsolve.net site aims to fill a gap left by the Oracle takeover of Sun.  You can find all kinds of useful information about available patches, both bug and security, as well as patch clusters for the various versions [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was recently alerted to a useful resource for the Solaris Community that is worth sharing.  The <a title="wesunsolve.net" href="http://wesunsolve.net" target="_blank">wesunsolve.net</a> site aims to fill a gap left by the Oracle takeover of Sun.  You can find all kinds of useful information about available patches, both bug and security, as well as patch clusters for the various versions of Solaris.  In the future, we&#8217;ll collect such useful resources in a Friends section of this site, but until that&#8217;s ready, this will hopefully direct more people to a great site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.opencsw.org/2011/08/wesunsolve-net-a-useful-solaris-community-resource/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A New Direction for OpenCSW</title>
		<link>http://www.opencsw.org/2011/07/a-new-direction-for-opencsw/</link>
		<comments>http://www.opencsw.org/2011/07/a-new-direction-for-opencsw/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jul 2011 01:29:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>bwalton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Announcements]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.opencsw.org/?p=964</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We just wrapped up a vote on the adoption of a new release process.  The results were in favour of adopting the proposal. The result of this is that we&#8217;re going to steer our internal release processes toward as much automation as possible.  Although there are many details to sort out yet, we think that the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We just wrapped up a vote on the adoption of a new <a title="Automated Release" href="http://wiki.opencsw.org/automated-release-proposal" target="_blank">release process</a>.  The results were in favour of adopting the proposal.</p>
<p>The result of this is that we&#8217;re going to steer our internal release processes toward as much automation as possible.  Although there are many details to sort out yet, we think that the new process will result in a much nicer work flow without sacrificing package quality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.opencsw.org/2011/07/a-new-direction-for-opencsw/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>pkgutil 2.4 released</title>
		<link>http://www.opencsw.org/2011/05/pkgutil-2-3-released/</link>
		<comments>http://www.opencsw.org/2011/05/pkgutil-2-3-released/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 May 2011 14:45:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>bonivart</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Recent updates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pkgutil]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.opencsw.org/?p=911</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Pkgutil 2.4 was released 2011-05-15. Change log: pkgutil: new option &#8211;cleanup. When invoked, scans for /var/sadm/pkg/*/install/obsolete. If it finds /var/sadm/pkg/CSWlibfoo/install/obsolete and nothing installed depends on CSWlibfoo, then CSWlibfoo gets removed from the system Support key package (/etc/opt/csw/pki, /var/opt/csw/pki). Change default homedir (Ben Walton) Parse option for download, incl. catalog and md5 (Maciej Blizinski) Include distribution [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pkgutil 2.4 was released 2011-05-15. Change log:</p>
<ul>
<li>pkgutil: new option &#8211;cleanup. When invoked, scans for /var/sadm/pkg/*/install/obsolete. If it finds /var/sadm/pkg/CSWlibfoo/install/obsolete and nothing installed depends on CSWlibfoo, then CSWlibfoo gets removed from the system</li>
<li>Support key package (/etc/opt/csw/pki, /var/opt/csw/pki). Change default homedir (Ben Walton)</li>
<li>Parse option for download, incl. catalog and md5 (Maciej Blizinski)</li>
<li>Include distribution (e.g. unstable) with pkgliststyle 2</li>
<li>Support absolute paths in &#8211;output (Dago)</li>
<li>Show last two parts of mirror path as distribution (e.g. dublin/core)</li>
<li>Change default pkgliststyle to 2</li>
<li>Speed up option -l with glob</li>
<li>Silence &#8220;Checking integrity …&#8221; when &#8211;parse is on (4693@OpenCSW)</li>
<li>pkgutil: eval &#8216;PATH=/opt/csw/bin:$PATH exec perl -x -w $0 ${1+&#8221;$@&#8221;}&#8217; (PCA)</li>
<li>pkgutil: fix pkgask/response bug (3205333@SF) (Julian Clifton-Thompson)</li>
<li>pkgutil: fix a bug in &#8211;cleanup when using &#8211;yes or auto (admin not set)</li>
<li>Do not duplicate mirrors present in pkgutil.conf in both /opt and /etc (4693@OpenCSW)</li>
<li>Fix bug in hook support (Ben Walton)</li>
<li>bldcat: add -q/&#8211;quiet option</li>
<li>bldcat: improve support for non-CSW packages (3300709@SF) (Mark Heily)</li>
<li>chkcat: add -c/&#8211;nocyclic option to skip cyclic dependency checking, helps speed a lot</li>
<li>chkcat: suppress warning exit code 1 when using &#8211;erroronly</li>
<li>chkcat: multiple catalog files can be specified and checked as a set (Maciej Blizinski)</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.opencsw.org/2011/05/pkgutil-2-3-released/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

