OpenCSW Bug Tracker


Viewing Issue Simple Details Jump to Notes ] View Advanced ] Issue History ] Print ]
ID Category Severity Reproducibility Date Submitted Last Update
0003863 [fetchmail] regular use major sometimes 2009-08-20 12:09 2010-01-30 15:39
Reporter pfelecan View Status public  
Assigned To james
Priority normal Resolution unable to reproduce  
Status closed  
Summary 0003863: dumps core when run under SMF control on SPARC
Description running under SMF control gives, in /var/svc/log/network-cswfetchmail:default.log, the following error:

[ Aug 20 12:00:36 Executing start method ("/var/opt/csw/svc/method/svc-cswfetchmail start") ]
Starting the fetchmail daemon using /opt/csw/etc/fetchmailrc
fetchmail: WARNING: Running as root is discouraged.
fetchmail: removing stale lockfile
[ Aug 20 12:00:36 Method "start" exited with status 0 ]
[ Aug 20 12:00:39 Stopping because process dumped core. ]
[ Aug 20 12:00:39 Executing stop method ("/var/opt/csw/svc/method/svc-cswfetchmail stop") ]
[ Aug 20 12:00:39 Method "stop" exited with status 0 ]

In the /var/log/syslog file we have:
Aug 20 12:01:51 abhavana fetchmail[26807]: [ID 260362 mail.info] starting fetchmail 6.3.11 daemon

each second...

The /opt/csw/etc/fetchmailrc file contains:

set syslog
set daemon 60
poll...

Note that it worked before the upgrade to 6.3.11,REV=2009.08.08

When starting manually:

/opt/csw/bin/fetchmail -f /opt/csw/etc/fetchamailrc

it doesn't dump core.


Additional Information
Tags No tags attached.
Attached Files

- Relationships

-  Notes
(0006630)
james (reporter)
2009-08-21 10:25

I am unable to reproduce this. fetchmail is running for me on Solaris 10 Sparc. Please supply more information to help find the problem.
(0006888)
james (reporter)
2009-10-25 09:51

New version 6.3.12 released. Does this make any difference? It's running on Solaris 10 Sparc for me. Any other clues?

      

(0007313)
james (reporter)
2010-01-23 12:37

We are now on 6.3.13 and this report was made 2 versions ago. Does the problem still exist?
(0007334)
pfelecan (developer)
2010-01-24 14:49

not in my current configuration. however, note that depending on what the configuration is we can have a quite eratic behaviour. unfortunately I don't have the time to dig this more than that.
(0007336)
james (reporter)
2010-01-24 20:16

How about we close this bug and if you get a concrete failure example you can always open another case.
(0007368)
pfelecan (developer)
2010-01-30 12:55

indeed, you can close it<


Copyright © 2000 - 2008 Mantis Group
Powered by Mantis Bugtracker