Mantis - texlive_xetex
Viewing Issue Advanced Details
ID: Category: Severity: Reproducibility: Date Submitted: Last Update:
3508 packaging minor have not tried 2009-03-27 17:30 2010-10-05 20:38
Reporter: dam Platform:  
Assigned To: pfelecan OS:  
Priority: normal OS Version:  
Status: closed Product Version:  
Product Build: Resolution: fixed  
Projection: none      
ETA: none Fixed in Version:  
Summary: 0003508: Package shouldn't contain texi2pdf
Description: The package contains
    /opt/csw/bin/texi2pdf
which is also in CSWtexinfo. IMHO it should not be in CSWtetex.
Steps To Reproduce:
Additional Information:
Relationships
has duplicate 0004318closed dam texinfo File clash with CSWtetex 
Attached Files:
Issue History
Date Modified Username Field Change
2009-03-27 17:30 dam New Issue
2009-03-27 18:37 pfelecan Note Added: 0005769
2009-03-27 18:37 pfelecan Status new => acknowledged
2009-03-27 18:37 pfelecan Status acknowledged => assigned
2009-03-27 18:37 pfelecan Assigned To => pfelecan
2009-04-01 15:07 dam Note Added: 0005807
2010-03-02 21:40 dam Relationship added has duplicate 0004318
2010-03-15 12:58 dam Note Added: 0007650
2010-10-05 20:38 pfelecan Status assigned => resolved
2010-10-05 20:38 pfelecan Resolution open => fixed
2010-10-05 20:38 pfelecan Status resolved => closed

Notes
(0005769)
pfelecan   
2009-03-27 18:37   
That's so true. When a new upstream version is available I'll remove this from the package. However, teTeX is not evolving anymore and a TeXLive packaging seems more adequate.
(0005807)
dam   
2009-04-01 15:07   
The path
  /opt/csw/share/man/man1/infokey.1
is also in tetex and in texinfo and should be removed from tetex.
(0007650)
dam   
2010-03-15 12:58   
The texi2pdf binary is both in CSWtetex and CSWtexinfo, but the texi2pdf(1) manpage is only in CSWtexinfo, so I think it should be removed from CSWtexinfo.

The infokey binary is only in CSWtexinfo and not CSWtexinfo, so the infokey.1 manpage really doesn't belong to CSWtetex and should be removed.

Do you see a chance to rebuild the package with GAR?