Notes |
|
(0005852)
|
car
|
2009-04-05 05:16
|
|
This issue predates my adoption of the package, which doesn't excuse me for not checking that there were no open issues when I took it on. I know about it now, though. |
|
|
(0006392)
|
car
|
2009-07-04 01:16
|
|
It seems to me that the slightly harder route, to fix the script so that it *is* Bourne shell compatible, is probably the better fix.
At a brief glance, the problem seems to be a couple of if tests unadorned by []. Fixing these certainly gets rid of the warnings and the script appears to function properly afterwards. I'll double-check this later, submit a new package to testing, then submit a patch upstream if this fixes the issue. |
|
|
(0009048)
|
jay
|
2011-05-14 15:05
|
|
! is required by POSIX. See section 2.9.2 of http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/utilities/xcu_chap02.html [^]
It looks like the ultimate problem is that the source distribution hard-codes the interpreter:
$ head -n1 locate/updatedb.sh
#! /bin/sh
In other words, findutils assumes /bin/sh is POSIX-compliant. If that's not true on your systems, you will need to path that I think.
Lack of mktemp is trickier. Looks like you may need your findutils package to depend on something that provides it, if the base OS does not. |
|
|
(0009056)
|
james
|
2011-05-16 10:48
(edited on: 2011-05-16 10:56) |
|
The date on the POSIX reference is 2004 and this bug was registered in 2005. It is highly likely at that time, using Solaris 8, /bin/sh was not POSIX compliment. Whether it was or not is not relevant to the fact of the matter being that gupdatedb failed on a target system and was fixable using the suggestion I made in 2005.
On Solaris 9, the current base system, gupdatedb appear to works. Is this proof that if reports are ignored for long enough there exists a probability that bugs will fix themselves? And if we wait long enough this bug report could morph into the complete works of Shakespeare.
|
|
|
(0009175)
|
bwalton
|
2011-07-02 19:32
|
|
Closing this since it only affects Solaris 8 which is not supported any longer.
-Ben |
|
|
(0009176)
|
james
|
2011-07-02 20:15
|
|
The mktemp errors still applies? |
|
|
(0009177)
|
bwalton
|
2011-07-03 03:44
|
|
Yes it does. Sorry. I've updated the build recipe and will push an update soon.
Thanks
-Ben |
|
|
(0009178)
|
james
|
2011-07-03 09:44
|
|
|